‘Am not afraid of jail, will return home soon’
NISAR AHMED THOKAR
Islamabad, Feb 22: The chairman of Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front, Muhammad Yasin Malik, has said the mindset that killed Gandhi has led to the hanging of Muhammad Afzal Guru.
Malik, currently on a private visit to Pakistan, made these assertions during an interview with Greater Kashmir.
Malik said that in 2006 he had apprised the Indian leadership of the repercussions of the court verdict against Guru and made it clear that the hanging would have serious implication on the overall situation in the region. He said, “When Supreme Court announced death sentence for Guru, Kashmir witnessed large scale protests against the decision which were organized by almost all pro-freedom parties.”
Malik said, “We organised a day-long Dharna at Jantar Mantar which was attended by Parliament members and representatives of civil society including the wife and son of Afzal Guru. I sent a communiqué to the Prime Minister of India through one of my journalist friends wherein I apprised him of the repercussions of the court verdict and urged him not to push Kashmiris to another bloodbath.”
Regarding the PM’s response, Malik said, “The response from the Prime Minister of India, which my journalist friend told me, was positive but at the same time he was apprehensive that there are opposition parties who have different stand on this issue.” Malik said he met general secretaries of both the communist parties of India, A B Bardhan and Prakash Karat in this regard. “I telephoned Atal Bihari Vajpayee, he was not well at that time and I talked to his adviser Brijesh Mishra on phone and communicated him the same message.”
The JKLF chief said he met almost all leading journalists and editors of both print and electronic media in Delhi. He said that all of them supported his view and realized the fact that Guru’s hanging will have far reaching consequences.
He said that it was very unfortunate that the President of India dismissed Afzal’s mercy petition and he was hanged in secrecy. “It is the murder of judiciary and their own Constitution because Guru had Constitutional and legal right to go again to the court after the dismissal of the mercy petition, but he was not given that opportunity,” Malik regretted.
“I have a question for Indian conscience, the people who believe in democracy and justice, and particularly to the Prime Minister of India who claims to represent the ideology of Gandhi. Only Shiv Sena, Bajrang Dal and RSS demanded that Guru should be hanged. Was the decision of sending Guru to the gallows taken to satisfy the conscience of these extremists?” Malik asked. “This is the same ideology and same people who killed Gandhi,” he added.
“Shall we make an opinion that India as a whole has been virtually taken over by the killers of Gandhi?” he asked, adding that they were the people who have not spared thinkers and writers in India. “They were brute with MF Hussain who died in exile, they did not spare the lawyers community, they attacked senior Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bushan in his office and beat him ruthlessly,” he said.
“These people with extremist mindset have killed thousands of people in Gujarat, they did not even spare a pregnant woman who was killed including the baby who was yet to be born,” he said.
He said that it was astonishing to see that the same people were voted to power in Gujarat.
Referring to a sequence of related events, Malik said, “In 1984, India hanged Maqbool Bhat at same place in the same month. Prior to that tragic incident, Kashmiri people throughout their 5000-year long history had never shown any inclination towards violent means of struggle.”
“But after the hanging of JKLF founder, a Maqbool Bhat was born in every home of Kashmir, I’m one among them,” Malik said.
About Kashmiris’ ongoing struggle, he said, “Now when the people of Kashmir have shown a transition from a violent to non-violent democratic movement, Indian State used military power to suppress this movement by killing 72 people in 2008, 44 in 2009 and 124 in 2010. Even then Kashmiri people still remained committed to non-violent struggle.”
“Bearing in mind the attitude and behavior of India towards Kashmiris, the question arises whether the Indian State has an intention to push the new generation of Kashmir to a violent path?” he said.
These are the questions which, he said, Indian State, civil society and the different political school of thoughts in India must reply.
On Indo-Pak dialogue process, Malik said, “The dialogue process has been going on for last several years and whenever there is a dialogue anywhere in the world on any issue, it gives a hope and optimism to the people and during the process of dialogue people expect positive behavior from the States.”
He made it clear that Kashmiris were not averse to friendly relations between the two countries. He said, “We have a reason to question them that on one hand the process of dialogue is going on while on the other we see victimization of Kashmiris continues unabated.”
Regarding the opening of channels of communications and dialogue at different levels, Malik said, “We have 25-year experience of this, whenever there are crises in Kashmir, Indian civil society gets active and Indian State always uses them as fire-fighters to ease the tension.” He said that the civil society of India could not prevent the hanging of Afzal Guru, they could not stop Indian State in pronouncing life imprisonment sentences to 32 Kashmiris youth who have been languishing in jails for last several years.
“The fact remains that India uses them as a tool to ease the situation whenever there are crises in the region and secondly we saw that they don’t pursue whatever tell people during their meetings and ultimately when situation shows a mark of improvement they suddenly go off the scene,” he maintained.
The Indian civil society, he said, was suffering from credibility crisis in Kashmir. “They can’t be used as fire fighters always, during crisis they make tall claims and when the crisis are over we fail to find their addresses,” the JKLF chairman said.
Regarding the returning of Guru’s body to his family, Malik said, “This is the legal as well as the Constitutional right of the family and I was surprised to see the statement of Indian Prime Minister that Parliament would decide about it. What Parliament has to do with this, there is a procedure in their Constitutional and legal framework that before hanging a person his family should be informed in advance and they must be given the opportunity to meet each other and after the hanging dead body is handed over to the family but in Guru’s case we saw he was not allowed to meet his wife and son nor his dead body was given to them.” Malik, however, was of the view that Indian civil society can play important role and pursue their government to hand over the body to his relatives as soon as possible.
Expressing deep discontent over the secret execution of Guru in Tihar Jail, he said, “For Kashmiris there was a message of hatred and arrogance from Indian State and they (Indians) conveyed this message to the people of Kashmir that they can go to any extent.”
Terming this attitude as unacceptable, Malik said, “I don’t think this kind of attitude on the part of India can work,” he said.
Regarding the BJP leaders’ demand of cancellation of his passport, Malik said, “After Afzal Guru’s hanging, JKLF Supreme Head Mr. Amanullah Khan and me held a joint press conference and announced 24-hour hunger strike against the execution and to press the Government of India to return the body to the relatives.”
“Hunger strike has a universal message whereby you give trouble to yourself to register a protest. A large number of people came to visit the hunger strike camp in Islamabad. People from civil society of Pakistan, the whole leadership from Azad Kashmir and others visited the camp on their own and we did not invite anybody to join us. Hafiz Syed also came there and stayed there for 15 minutes. The next day we were surprised to see that rather than focusing on what was happening in Kashmir, the whole Indian media was abuzz with the news that Yasin Malik should be arrested and his passport must be cancelled,” Malik rued.
“How unfortunate it is that when in 2006 I met the same person at Mureedke (Lahore) at a five-hour meeting and addressed a joint public gathering, at that time it was not offensive news for India despite the fact that Syed had been declared as most wanted person by India,” he said.
He said, “There was a high profile peace process going on between the two countries and when I met Syed I told him that the militant leadership must be part of the process and they must support and create an atmosphere for the dialogue process, nobody raised objection then,” he added.
“On 10th of February when Hafiz Syed visited the hunger-strike camp there was no meeting, nothing was going on and they (Indians) made it a big issue,” Malik said.
The JKLF chairman said, “Now they have decided to cancel my passport and they may arrest me. Let they do whatever they want, but I have already said that jail is my second home. I am not afraid of jails as I’ve spent more than 10 years in prison. I have seen worst jails in India like Jodhpur. I was kept with mentally retarded people for one year in Agra. I have seen interrogations and torture cells and if they want to use this method again they can,” Malik said.
Replying a question, he said, “Why should I be afraid? I believe in my ideology that I want to liberate Kashmir through non-violent democratic means. This is my faith and my romance and I will pursue my ideology and if they take me to jail or interrogation centers it is their wish and let them fulfill their desire.”
Malik said, “I will be back home soon. Currently I’m working to get travel documents of my 11-month old daughter and as soon as I get it I will return home at the earliest possible time.”
The JKLF chairman is one of the pioneers of resistance movement and a key member of the famous HAJY group which initiated armed struggle in Kashmir in late ’80s.
After four years of armed struggle when militancy was at its peak, Malik announced a unilateral ceasefire in 1994 and decided to pursue his ideology through non-violent and democratic means.
The decision was hugely criticized in Kashmir but it earned a lot of appreciation at international level. The decision of unilateral ceasefire even led to split in his organization.
Since 1994, Malik has been championing the cause of Kashmiris peacefully and has been able to launch massive public awareness campaigns in Kashmir besides pursuing the civil society of India to get the dispute of Kashmir resolved through peaceful means. Despite the fact that hundreds of his party activists were allegedly killed by government forces during the recent years, Malik seems quite determined to continue his non-violent struggle to achieve his goal.
Malik, currently on a private visit to Pakistan, made these assertions during an interview with Greater Kashmir.
Malik said that in 2006 he had apprised the Indian leadership of the repercussions of the court verdict against Guru and made it clear that the hanging would have serious implication on the overall situation in the region. He said, “When Supreme Court announced death sentence for Guru, Kashmir witnessed large scale protests against the decision which were organized by almost all pro-freedom parties.”
Malik said, “We organised a day-long Dharna at Jantar Mantar which was attended by Parliament members and representatives of civil society including the wife and son of Afzal Guru. I sent a communiqué to the Prime Minister of India through one of my journalist friends wherein I apprised him of the repercussions of the court verdict and urged him not to push Kashmiris to another bloodbath.”
Regarding the PM’s response, Malik said, “The response from the Prime Minister of India, which my journalist friend told me, was positive but at the same time he was apprehensive that there are opposition parties who have different stand on this issue.” Malik said he met general secretaries of both the communist parties of India, A B Bardhan and Prakash Karat in this regard. “I telephoned Atal Bihari Vajpayee, he was not well at that time and I talked to his adviser Brijesh Mishra on phone and communicated him the same message.”
The JKLF chief said he met almost all leading journalists and editors of both print and electronic media in Delhi. He said that all of them supported his view and realized the fact that Guru’s hanging will have far reaching consequences.
He said that it was very unfortunate that the President of India dismissed Afzal’s mercy petition and he was hanged in secrecy. “It is the murder of judiciary and their own Constitution because Guru had Constitutional and legal right to go again to the court after the dismissal of the mercy petition, but he was not given that opportunity,” Malik regretted.
“I have a question for Indian conscience, the people who believe in democracy and justice, and particularly to the Prime Minister of India who claims to represent the ideology of Gandhi. Only Shiv Sena, Bajrang Dal and RSS demanded that Guru should be hanged. Was the decision of sending Guru to the gallows taken to satisfy the conscience of these extremists?” Malik asked. “This is the same ideology and same people who killed Gandhi,” he added.
“Shall we make an opinion that India as a whole has been virtually taken over by the killers of Gandhi?” he asked, adding that they were the people who have not spared thinkers and writers in India. “They were brute with MF Hussain who died in exile, they did not spare the lawyers community, they attacked senior Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bushan in his office and beat him ruthlessly,” he said.
“These people with extremist mindset have killed thousands of people in Gujarat, they did not even spare a pregnant woman who was killed including the baby who was yet to be born,” he said.
He said that it was astonishing to see that the same people were voted to power in Gujarat.
Referring to a sequence of related events, Malik said, “In 1984, India hanged Maqbool Bhat at same place in the same month. Prior to that tragic incident, Kashmiri people throughout their 5000-year long history had never shown any inclination towards violent means of struggle.”
“But after the hanging of JKLF founder, a Maqbool Bhat was born in every home of Kashmir, I’m one among them,” Malik said.
About Kashmiris’ ongoing struggle, he said, “Now when the people of Kashmir have shown a transition from a violent to non-violent democratic movement, Indian State used military power to suppress this movement by killing 72 people in 2008, 44 in 2009 and 124 in 2010. Even then Kashmiri people still remained committed to non-violent struggle.”
“Bearing in mind the attitude and behavior of India towards Kashmiris, the question arises whether the Indian State has an intention to push the new generation of Kashmir to a violent path?” he said.
These are the questions which, he said, Indian State, civil society and the different political school of thoughts in India must reply.
On Indo-Pak dialogue process, Malik said, “The dialogue process has been going on for last several years and whenever there is a dialogue anywhere in the world on any issue, it gives a hope and optimism to the people and during the process of dialogue people expect positive behavior from the States.”
He made it clear that Kashmiris were not averse to friendly relations between the two countries. He said, “We have a reason to question them that on one hand the process of dialogue is going on while on the other we see victimization of Kashmiris continues unabated.”
Regarding the opening of channels of communications and dialogue at different levels, Malik said, “We have 25-year experience of this, whenever there are crises in Kashmir, Indian civil society gets active and Indian State always uses them as fire-fighters to ease the tension.” He said that the civil society of India could not prevent the hanging of Afzal Guru, they could not stop Indian State in pronouncing life imprisonment sentences to 32 Kashmiris youth who have been languishing in jails for last several years.
“The fact remains that India uses them as a tool to ease the situation whenever there are crises in the region and secondly we saw that they don’t pursue whatever tell people during their meetings and ultimately when situation shows a mark of improvement they suddenly go off the scene,” he maintained.
The Indian civil society, he said, was suffering from credibility crisis in Kashmir. “They can’t be used as fire fighters always, during crisis they make tall claims and when the crisis are over we fail to find their addresses,” the JKLF chairman said.
Regarding the returning of Guru’s body to his family, Malik said, “This is the legal as well as the Constitutional right of the family and I was surprised to see the statement of Indian Prime Minister that Parliament would decide about it. What Parliament has to do with this, there is a procedure in their Constitutional and legal framework that before hanging a person his family should be informed in advance and they must be given the opportunity to meet each other and after the hanging dead body is handed over to the family but in Guru’s case we saw he was not allowed to meet his wife and son nor his dead body was given to them.” Malik, however, was of the view that Indian civil society can play important role and pursue their government to hand over the body to his relatives as soon as possible.
Expressing deep discontent over the secret execution of Guru in Tihar Jail, he said, “For Kashmiris there was a message of hatred and arrogance from Indian State and they (Indians) conveyed this message to the people of Kashmir that they can go to any extent.”
Terming this attitude as unacceptable, Malik said, “I don’t think this kind of attitude on the part of India can work,” he said.
Regarding the BJP leaders’ demand of cancellation of his passport, Malik said, “After Afzal Guru’s hanging, JKLF Supreme Head Mr. Amanullah Khan and me held a joint press conference and announced 24-hour hunger strike against the execution and to press the Government of India to return the body to the relatives.”
“Hunger strike has a universal message whereby you give trouble to yourself to register a protest. A large number of people came to visit the hunger strike camp in Islamabad. People from civil society of Pakistan, the whole leadership from Azad Kashmir and others visited the camp on their own and we did not invite anybody to join us. Hafiz Syed also came there and stayed there for 15 minutes. The next day we were surprised to see that rather than focusing on what was happening in Kashmir, the whole Indian media was abuzz with the news that Yasin Malik should be arrested and his passport must be cancelled,” Malik rued.
“How unfortunate it is that when in 2006 I met the same person at Mureedke (Lahore) at a five-hour meeting and addressed a joint public gathering, at that time it was not offensive news for India despite the fact that Syed had been declared as most wanted person by India,” he said.
He said, “There was a high profile peace process going on between the two countries and when I met Syed I told him that the militant leadership must be part of the process and they must support and create an atmosphere for the dialogue process, nobody raised objection then,” he added.
“On 10th of February when Hafiz Syed visited the hunger-strike camp there was no meeting, nothing was going on and they (Indians) made it a big issue,” Malik said.
The JKLF chairman said, “Now they have decided to cancel my passport and they may arrest me. Let they do whatever they want, but I have already said that jail is my second home. I am not afraid of jails as I’ve spent more than 10 years in prison. I have seen worst jails in India like Jodhpur. I was kept with mentally retarded people for one year in Agra. I have seen interrogations and torture cells and if they want to use this method again they can,” Malik said.
Replying a question, he said, “Why should I be afraid? I believe in my ideology that I want to liberate Kashmir through non-violent democratic means. This is my faith and my romance and I will pursue my ideology and if they take me to jail or interrogation centers it is their wish and let them fulfill their desire.”
Malik said, “I will be back home soon. Currently I’m working to get travel documents of my 11-month old daughter and as soon as I get it I will return home at the earliest possible time.”
The JKLF chairman is one of the pioneers of resistance movement and a key member of the famous HAJY group which initiated armed struggle in Kashmir in late ’80s.
After four years of armed struggle when militancy was at its peak, Malik announced a unilateral ceasefire in 1994 and decided to pursue his ideology through non-violent and democratic means.
The decision was hugely criticized in Kashmir but it earned a lot of appreciation at international level. The decision of unilateral ceasefire even led to split in his organization.
Since 1994, Malik has been championing the cause of Kashmiris peacefully and has been able to launch massive public awareness campaigns in Kashmir besides pursuing the civil society of India to get the dispute of Kashmir resolved through peaceful means. Despite the fact that hundreds of his party activists were allegedly killed by government forces during the recent years, Malik seems quite determined to continue his non-violent struggle to achieve his goal.